If for some reason at some point you want to revert this it will be straightforward there is only one commit. Instead of merge, you could squash the commits into one and rebase it on your feature branch with the name “Upgraded this.that”. Of course you will have more commits on this “upgrade” branch, but you don’t want it public. When this can be applied? Well for example you want to try something new for your project, upgrade technologies as seamless as possible. But you should be comfortable with git and must to keep everything clean (squash commits). I was always guided by the next rule of thumb: “Use rebase for getting the latest updates for your branch from origin and use merge when you want to put code from one branch to another” But, you could have an addition to this rule which can state: “You can rebase private branches as long they don’t have a public mirror”. On the other hand, you have the power to rewrite(and possibly break things) if you don’t know what are you are doing. Less commits, easy to fix things and easy to read the reflog. Git pull –rebase (develop branch)Īs you can see the history it’s clean and trackable. ![]() Hard to read, but if you are using feature branch strategy you don’t really care. The first will create an extra merge commit (but maybe we don’t really care about the history), while the second will create a clean history (but can rewrite history which can be dangerous if not used properly). The first will create a merge commit, while the second will do put your changes on top of the others. ![]() git pull vs git pull –rebase Behind the scenes both of them will do a git fetch origin, but after that one does merge and the other rebase. Now here there comes the difference of opinions. We are rebasing on our private branch, which does not break the rule. The question that appears here is: “What about getting latest updates from origin branch?” After all the origin branch is a public branch. “The golden rule of git rebase is to never use it on public branches.” Obviously this makes sense. There is a thing called The Golden Rule of Rebasing. If you’re not using git by now, you are a dinosaur. Git has been around from some time now and offers lots of functionality in comparison with SVN. ![]() Rebasing local history is OK (it’s more than OK, it’s sometimes necessary to maintain a clean history), but changing other people commits history is considered a bad practice.This is the question. I DO NOT encourage rebasing remote (public or shared) branches. NOTE: Because of many discussions about this note. On the upside your commits will still be on top of everything so you can change, rearrange or remove them before pushing your version to a remote repository. To get to the next batch of conflicts (if you have any). If you want to merge a feature branch it might be wiser to actually merge your commits (thus having a single point of integration of two distinct branches).Ĭonflict resolving will be now per commit basis, not everything-at-once, so you will have to use git rebase -continue It means that your commits are rebased onto current remote HEAD. ![]() Note the “rewinding head to replay your work on top of it…”. Remote: Total 23 (delta 16), reused 0 (delta 0)įirst, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it.įast-forwarded master to 3e62251c80998bf744f35d0d8e732e2cff01e072. Pull into Current Using Rebase (for remote branches) to fetch changes from the selected branch and rebase the current branch on top of these changes. Remote: Compressing objects: 100% (21/21), done. The result should be similar to Creidhne:project hasik$ git pull -rebase The command will apply all your yet-to-be-pushed commits on top of the remote tree commits allowing your commits to be straight in a row and without branches (easier git bisects, yay!). To keep the repository clean, your commits always on top of the tree until you push them to a remote server. You are actually issuing git fetch + git merge commands, which will result with an extra commit and ugly merge bubbles in your commit log (check out gitk to see them). What you might not know is that by typing git pull When working on a project you usually synchronize your code by pulling it several times a day. This note was originally published on coderwall and.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |